![[Document page]](images/doc.gif)
Parents may NOT be forced to send their children to public schools.-Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 1925, U.S. Supreme CourtCharacteristics of Parents who educate their Children at HomeThey tend to be individualistic, law-abiding, concerned about their parent role, dissatisfied with available options in contemporary education, and actively engaged in implementing their own solution. They desire to reestablish the home as the basic unit in a free enterprise society and are willing to confront social opposition in order to meet their personal goals.-"Selected Characteristics of Home Schools & Parents Who Operate Them", 1981, by Gunnar A. Gustavsen, Andrews University, Berrien Springs, Michigan Home Education - Georgia StyleA Georgia Judge Speaks - "Five Laws That Teachers May Be Violating Today"
-By Braswell Deen, Jr., Chief Judge, Georgia Court of Appeals Major Reasons for Home Schooling1978
1980In June new regulations for Georgia's Compulsory Attendance law were presented to the State Board of Education. The proposal never went to a vote but would have defined schools as follows:
1982"Socialization - and lack of it in home schools - is at the root of most public educator's opposition to such schools. 'The most important aspect of schooling is socialization rather than the skills. That's the way teachers are trained in college today and why academics are not stressed. Humanism - the child's well-being in life with his fellow man and love of people around him come first .... [Parents] expect the child to be perfect, and they push the child to achieve.'"-"Private School Requirements Lax; Only Child's Attendance Compulsory", by Judy Hotchkiss, Southside & Fayette Sun Newspaper, 12-23-82 January 13, 1983The January 13th edition of the Atlanta Journal article, "Rules Proposed to End Home Schools in Georgia", by Jane Hansen, reported that the same day the superintendent proposed his anti-home-school regulations, a Stephens County home-school couple was convicted of 19 violations of the state's compulsory attendance law. Sentencing was set for January 20th for Terry and Vickie Roemhild of Martin, Georgia, about 15 miles south of Toccoa.January 22, 1983Because the State Board of Education had been presented regulations that would outlaw home education, home schooling families and friends met at the Lilburn City Hall and organized Georgians for Freedom in Education (GFE) on January 22nd. The proposed regulations were the same as those never brought to a vote in 1980.GFE's First ProjectSince the state board vote on the new regulations would be February 9th, 18 days after GFE's inception, they compiled and sent state-wide 200 packets of information to home educators, private schools, interested organizations, friends and allies.Results:
Terry Roemhild et al. v. StateIn July 1981 the Roemhilds began teaching their children at home and in a September 11th letter informed the local school principal, the local superintendent of schools and the state superintendent of schools that they were doing so. The State Department of Education replied that home-study decisions were made on the local level between parents, the school system and legal authorities. Their principal and superintendent would not discuss the matter with them. The Superior Court trial judge found them guilty of violating the compulsory attendance law 19 times - once for each of the days their children did not go to public school. However, they appealed to the Georgia Supreme Court that, on October 25, 1983, reversed the lower court's decision. March, 1984The Phyllis Schlafly Report referenced the Roemhild v. State case and stated, "The Court voided the Georgia compulsory school law as unconstitutional because it is impermissibly vague in violation of due process." She further stated that it was a significant victory for the Roemhilds and for the principle of home schooling.1984Home Education became legal in Georgia as S.B. 504 passed the Senate 52-1 & the House 146-24Provisions of S.B. 504:
Priceless quotes from Senators & Representatives during the 1984 debate on S.B. 504"'[This bill] restores faith and hope in our ability as a people to govern ourselves ....". -Senator John Foster"Whether we agree or not, parents have the right to educate their children [at home]." -Senator Roy Barnes In the House Education Committee the explanations for the two dissenting votes were as follows:
ConclusionGeorgians for Freedom in Education have been joined by other organizations that support and fight for home education. The Roemhilds' court case revealed the need for changing Georgia's compulsory attendance law to legalize home education. Terry and Vickie deserve your sincere gratitude for their courage and tenacity. The 1984 legislators listened to home educators and consulted them as they wrote S.B. 504 to legalize home education. During the past 14 years since that bill passed, there has been no change in the home school law although local school principals and superintendents have, at times, demanded more of home school parents and students than the law dictates. Home school parents know their rights and responsibilities and have withstood illegal regulations. The first real challenge to the 1984 law came in H.B. 586 in 1997 and school social workers were the only ones speaking for it before the House Education Committee hearing. You lobbied and won. Your hard-fighting predecessors would be proud of you. Congratulations! |
is re-publishing the preceding article with permission from Georgia insight published by:Sue Ella DeadwylerThis article was originally presented as a speech by Sue Ella Deadwyler at Harvest Home Educators' Conference on April 24, 1998.
4168 Rue Antoinette
Stone Mountain, Georgia 30083
| About HEIR ||| Home ||| Contents ||| News ||| Opinion |